TikTok being banned in the USA is not the issue

Related

獲五所國立大學音樂系長笛榜首 縣長接見年輕音樂家李盈箴

【記者 王克瑞 南投報導】  南投子弟李盈箴,今年參加大學考試,獲得臺師大、北藝大等五所國立大學音樂系長笛榜首,縣長許淑華9日下午接見,給予表揚,肯定李同學在音樂的卓越表現,期盼李盈箴不但是南投之光,未來也能成為台灣之光。  李盈箴家住草屯,八歲起學習長笛,先後就讀草屯國小音樂班、雙十國中音樂班,現就讀於臺中二中音樂班,師事楊璧甄老師,並曾接受多位國際知名長笛演奏家的指導,包括Denis Bouriakov、Paolo Taballione、Jürgen Franz等,大學考試獲得榜首,不僅家人高興,抱過小時候李盈箴的許縣長,更是惺惺相惜,當年的小孩子,如今變成落落大方的年輕音樂家。  縣府表揚李盈箴,除了李盈箴父母到場,議員李洲忠、藝術大師李轂摩等人也陪同出席;李盈箴學習長笛,屢獲佳績,包含2023年全國學生音樂比賽長笛高中A組第二名、第26屆日本琵琶湖國際長笛大賽晉級複賽,以及2024年第11屆香港國際表演藝術節大賽長笛青年組決賽第一名。  李盈箴不僅在比賽中表現傑出,也積極參與音樂會演出,2023年10月在臺中市晨露廳舉辦首場個人長笛獨奏會;2025年4月更於臺北鳴石音樂空間舉辦首場售票音樂會,廣獲好評。  今年大學術科考試,李盈箴共獲得臺師大、北藝大、國北教大、清大、臺藝大等五所國立大學音樂系長笛榜首,展現音樂實力。  許縣長表示,李盈箴熱情投入音樂學習,不僅為個人爭光,也為南投縣帶來榮耀,期勉她持續努力、朝國際舞台邁進,希望李盈箴未來也能在南投舉辦音樂會,並在國際舞台上發光發熱。  李盈箴表示,感謝許縣長的祝福和期待,她也很感謝父母的栽培,以及指導老師的教導,她會帶著大家的祝福,繼續努力,將所學回饋南投縣及台灣。

從生活到舞台「365天穿旗袍」的文化實踐

【記者 潘紅岩 綜合報導】  近日,中國旗袍文化推廣者余淑琴的旗袍作品入選北京地鐵《藝脈傳承》主題巡展,於地鐵1號線、2號線、5號線等七條線路同步展播。她透過流動的藝術形式,向公眾展現傳統服飾的當代生命力,引發社會廣泛關注。  身為「中國旗袍大使」「中華文化大使」,余淑琴深耕旗袍文化領域逾三十年,兼任世界紀錄認證官、世界和平親善會理事長、廈門中粟傳媒董事長等多重身份,被業界譽為「百變旗袍女神」。她以「365天著旗袍」的生活實踐,將旗袍從單純的服飾符號昇華為深具文化內涵的載體。  2016年,英國世界紀錄認證總部破例允許她穿著旗袍執行認證工作,打破傳統制服的既定規範;2018年,她更身著華麗旗袍登上美國紐約時代廣場大螢幕,向世界展示中國華服的獨特美學與文化張力。  同年4月,余淑琴於台灣發起成立「世界和平親善會」,邀請海基會前董事長林中森擔任榮譽理事長,藉由旗袍作為文化媒介,積極推動兩岸文化交流。她長年穿梭海峽兩岸,策劃「行走的文化藝術」系列活動,將旗袍文化與非遺傳承、經貿互動相結合,廣受好評,被譽為「海峽兩岸的旗袍使者」。  余淑琴發起的「世界郵票上的傑出華人」、「紐約時代廣場專題展播」等國際文化項目,成功突破地域與文化藩籬,讓旗袍走向全球,實現跨文化的深度交流與傳播。  此次北京地鐵巡展中,余淑琴的旗袍作品以「傳統紋樣的創新表達」為核心,巧妙融合宋錦、盤金繡等非遺技藝於現代旗袍設計中。不僅保留龍鳳呈祥、海水江崖等經典紋飾,亦透過幾何剪裁與抽象配色回應當代審美。正如她所言:「旗袍不僅是衣袂翩躚的美,更是連接歷史與未來的文化脈絡。」  巡展期間,不少乘客駐足拍照,留下深刻印象。有市民表示:「在通勤的路上邂逅傳統美學,這樣的文化推廣方式既鮮活又感人。」  從紐約時代廣場到北京地鐵長廊,余淑琴以旗袍為筆,書寫中華文化的當代表達。她始終秉持「以柔美的力量推動和平」的信念,讓旗袍成為串聯兩岸、對話世界的文化橋梁,為非遺傳承與跨文化交流提供了一個兼具溫度與深度的實踐典範。

慈善皇后游翠英以畫筆傳情 6/7南投盛大開幕

【記者 王克瑞 南投報導】  美學藝術家暨慈善皇后游翠英,於114年6月7日至17日,在南投縣政府文化局日月展覽廳舉辦個人書畫創作展,展覽主題為《喜上眉梢 藝游山水》,邀請全國藝文愛好者一同走進她兼融東西方美學、溫潤細膩的藝術世界。  游翠英女士擁有中國文化大學美術系碩士學位,現任中華文化交流協會副理事長等多項職務,長年致力於公益與藝術推廣,並屢獲國內外獎項肯定。她曾榮獲2024年聯合國世界衛生組織卓越藝術NGO獎、2023年石景宜博士盃國畫優異獎,並入選2024年中國全國美展水墨國展,2025年再奪日本國際藝術大賞特選獎。  游翠英秉持「敬天愛地、惜物惜情」的創作理念,主張「師法自然、體現美學」,認為藝術不僅是視覺美感,更是與天地萬物對話的生命實踐。她的作品融合中西藝術語彙,將東方筆墨的婉約深遠與西方色彩構圖的張力完美融合,展現獨樹一幟的創作風格。  此次展出涵蓋山水、花鳥與書法類別,作品意境深遠,寓意吉祥,傳遞樂觀與祥和之美。對她而言,每一次筆觸都是對自然的致敬,每一幅作品,都是對生命與社會的溫柔回應。  中華將軍文化交流協會執行會長許水樹先生表示:游翠英不僅是藝術家,更是社會美善的傳遞者。她的畫展,猶如一場心靈旅程,引領觀者從日常喧囂中抽離,走入詩畫交織的寧靜世界,感受人與自然的深刻對話。  主辦單位:南投縣政府文化局,協辦單位:台灣十大社會團體總會、台灣世界藝術家交流協會、中華將軍文化交流協會。

端午品粽慶佳節 營養師教你吃得健康不負擔

【記者 潘紅岩 南投報導】  端午節將至,飄香四溢的粽子、熱鬧的龍舟競賽以及家人團聚的時光,是許多人心中難忘的節慶回憶。然而,在享受節慶美食的同時,民眾也應注意飲食均衡與健康管理。南投醫院營養師提醒,尤其是慢性疾病患者,更應在粽子選擇與攝取上多加留意,以免因一時大意影響血糖、血壓或血脂控制。  衛生福利部南投醫院毛柔壹營養師表示,一顆市售肉粽的熱量約在500大卡上下,若為油炒糯米、餡料豐富的北部粽,熱量甚至更高。加上糯米屬於高升糖指數食材,容易使血糖快速上升,建議一般成人一天以攝取一顆粽子為宜,並視個人情況調整主食及其他正餐份量,以維持熱量的平衡。  傳統粽子常見高油脂、高鈉食材,如五花肉、鹹蛋黃、花生等,蔬菜含量則較不足。毛柔壹營養師建議搭配一碗燙青菜、蔬菜湯或涼拌小菜,補充膳食纖維並增加飽足感。若為自製粽子,則可選擇瘦肉、雞胸肉或蝦仁等低脂蛋白質食材,並減少調味用鹽與油脂的使用,以降低整體熱量與鈉含量,有助血壓與血脂控制。  許多人吃粽子時會搭配甜辣醬、醬油膏等沾醬,這些醬料多含高鈉與精緻糖分,過量食用恐增加心血管與代謝疾病風險。毛柔壹營養師建議,以粽子原味品嚐為佳,減少對健康的負擔。  除了飲食控制,端午連假也是促進家庭互動與身體活動的好時機。建議餐後可與家人一起進行戶外活動,如散步、騎腳踏車或爬山,不僅可消耗過多熱量、穩定血糖,也有助提升心情與維持體能。  南投醫院營養師提醒,端午節雖是歡慶的日子,但透過聰明選擇食材、控制份量、適度運動及定時測量血糖,就能吃得安心、過得健康。誠摯祝福大家端午節快樂、闔家平安。

柚子手作點心看好恆春 邀老客人回娘家

【記者 潘紅岩 恆春報導】  在恆春鎮巷弄裡,「柚子手作點心」創辦人林佑蓉,從高雄到恆春定居超過十年,面對國旅瓶頸,推出「看好恆春」活動,邀老客人回來旅遊。  畢業自台藝大舞蹈系的林佑蓉很愛吃甜點,但食安風暴讓自己對甜點卻步,但實在是太愛吃甜點,故決定學習製作,一頭栽進烘焙的世界,目前甜點、鬆餅與生日蛋糕是「柚子手作點心」竄紅的主因。  一開始只做給親友品嚐,但親友頻頻敲碗,又因為愛上恆春的風景才來此創業,林佑蓉強調,初衷就是以天然健康的食材,提供好吃美味、用料實在且價格親民的甜點,像自己很重視食安,就堅持不使用食用色素,全部的顏色,都是天然的色粉,像紅色與黃色就是「梔子花」、灰色就是「竹炭粉」提煉出來的,因而讓家長很喜歡訂購給小孩吃。  自己的蛋糕不強調塑形或雕花,而強調天然健康,具有「減糖」特色,只使用當季水果,不使用罐頭水果,希望消費者吃到健康的東西,並使用比較貴、用鮮奶提煉出來的動物性鮮奶油,雖然成本比較高,但這就是自己創業的初衷。  不崇尚使用海外產品,是因為對台灣有深刻的信心,自創業開始,就堅持使用台灣的好東西,如果能在台灣找到,就一定是使用台灣食材,深信台灣也有好麵粉、好雞蛋、好香草莢等等,一路走來,就都使用台灣的品牌。  這十多年來物價飛漲,但仍堅持用最健康的食材,因此客群非常穩定,像雞蛋就是使用屏東放牧雞品牌「田庄好蛋」的雞蛋,因客戶不在乎外觀多美、多漂亮或多花俏,而是「只使用好食材」,像不使用食品添加物,例如:膨脹劑、穩定劑、膨鬆劑、調味劑、防腐劑、粘稠劑、著色劑與品質改良劑等,都是客人穩定的主因。  客群穩定回流的原因,還有客製化的口味與內餡,因為不甜且很新鮮,不使用水果罐頭,都直接跟小農購買,因此,搶購栗子與台灣小農限量日常產品,得下足功課。  疫情時曾想放棄創業,但人在日本,家人都在恆春的劉小姐,還特別傳來多張不同年份,全家一起品嚐蛋糕的照片打氣,強調全家一起品嚐母親節蛋糕,是全家人最美好的回憶,自己的蛋糕,陪伴許多客人重要的人生時刻,是自己離鄉背井在恆春創業,堅持下去的重要力量。  面對大環境的挑戰,國人熱衷出國,但自己看好恆春,對於渴望老味道與好味道的舊雨新知,雖可透過冷凍宅配預購,但是,手作蛋糕仍舊只能恆春當地預購,企盼召喚十年來的老客人,回來恆春,看美麗的海洋。  看好恆春《柚子手作點心 10週年回娘家抽蛋糕!》貼文活動:https://www.facebook.com/share/p/1ANnE6A17R/?mibextid=wwXIfr。

Share

【Reporter Andys compiled the report】

TikTok being banned in the USA is not the issue. The fact is, this is a ban on any current or future successful technology owned by a potential adversary and, let’s not make any mistake about it, China, where the ownership of TikTok’s parent company sits, is considered to be the major adversary, for now and for no other reason than the fear that they may be.

Mud in the water is being stirred up because, the 「dreaded ccp」 could get its hands on the data collected by TikTok and who knows what they could do with that, probably the same as they do with the data they Can collect from our use of digitally connected fridges, cars, cranes, mobile phones, laptops, computers and anything else that’s connected, even though there’s no evidence anywhere that they might.

ByteDance has set up a separate company to comply with US laws, it houses all its data in the US, under US corporate supervision. It employes international, not Chinese, experts to run the company and the CEO, who has the 「misfortune」 to be of Chinese origin, has testified under oath that he is not affiliated with, nor has he ever been a member of the Communist Party, he’s testified under oath that he’s never been asked to provide information to the Communist Party of China and that, if asked, he would not comply.

Let’s be honest with ourselves, it isn’t about data protection, if it were, the US would need to completely isolate themselves from the rest of the world to protect their data, even Google and Meta, two of the largest 「data collection corporations」 in the world have not faced the same scrutiny. Meta was fined billions last year by the Irish government for a massive data breach because they transferred data to the US where Data Protection Laws are not strong enough.

In The Cambridge Analytica court case, where Facebook data was used to sway the results of an election, two senior engineers admitted, they don’t even know where Meta’s data is all stored.

Google is even more interesting, it has data storage centres all over the world including three in Asia, one of which is in Taiwan. They were also themselves charged but settled for almost half a billion dollars in the USA and fined in France for data protection breaches.

Bytedance received a fine over illegal medical advertising but as far as can be ascertained in this research has never been charged over data breaches.

Obviously, the issues with TikTok are not about data protection, there are already laws to protect data, Bytedance and TikTok have complied with them and have responded to every request by the US government to satisfy their insecurities.

What it is really about is far deeper than a national (in)security issue, it’s much more about a recognition, without any admission, that the very fabric of their society is in the process of being torn apart. The latest allegations to emerge prove this.

The same allegation has arisen in the UK too, China, through Douyin, the Chinese version, is apparently pushing teenagers toward educational and cultural content whereas TikTok, is directing the British and American youth towards addictive content designed to erode ambition and motivation.

The truth is, Douyin in China has similar content, it has bad dancing, lip-synching, make-up and other frivolous content and those videos are pushed out to people who enjoy watching them. But it also has a huge number of viewers interested in maths, space exploration, scientific experiments and they are promoted to viewers who enjoy watching them too.

It isn’t a stereotype to say that Chinese kids are more interested in these kinds of topics, take a look at any university program in the West and they will be filled with Asian kids getting Bachelor degrees, Masters and PhDs. Since long before TikTok and social media existed, Chinese kids were already filling those courses. The US Government told us this In 2007, China surpassed the United States as the world’s largest producer of natural sciences and engineering doctoral degrees. By 2020, the number from China and India had eclipsed the USA.

TikTok being banned in the USA is not the issue
TikTok being banned in the USA is not the issue

What has really taken place is not a Chinese plot to dumb down America, it’s a stated fact that the US is dumbing itself down, the National Centre for Educational Statistics reports there has been a decline in maths and reading as well as an increase in students seeking mental health services. While these problems have accelerated since the Covid Pandemic, they were identified well before. It seems TikTok’s algorithms are merely responding to the needs and desires of Americans in the same way they are responding to the needs and desires of Chinese viewers by providing them exactly what they want.

Putting education aside, the USA has found itself in what Queensland University of Technology Adjunct Professor Warwick Powell calls an Auto-immune deficiency, its own policies are eating away at the health of its society and systems. They want free speech; therefore, they don’t want legislation to protect their young people. They criticise China for 「censoring」 the internet but then criticise China’s social media for not allowing the dumbing down of its youth.

The USA has a generation addicted to social media but criticises China for limiting the time young people can spend on social media. Something MIT referred to as an 「Escalating war on kids screen time」.

What China has done is sensibly controlled and efficiently managed what kids can do online, what the US has done has created the conditions for the decline of its own society and would now like to blame the one country that’s done the opposite.

The US legislation to ban foreign ownership of social media will probably succeed and this is a bad thing. Bytedance (not the CPC) will need to make a decision. Sell, fight through the legal system, or close down and stop operating in the USA.

If Bytedance sells to a US corporation, it will not improve data security, it will not improve the quality of videos available to their young people, it will not turn around the decline in educational standards and it will not reduce social media addiction.

If Bytedance pulls out, their politicians will lose a lot more than the credibility that’s already bubbling down the drain; they will lose the votes of a great many young people. The US already has laws to protect data, it can create laws to improve what’s online and by doing so would reverse a worrying societal decline. That would however, meet intense resistance from US social media operators.

One must wonder whether the lawmakers themselves have been dumbed down to a point where common sense no longer prevails!